Reviews

You're hearing, I'm deaf. We're different... Then I'll be deaf for you.

This is truly a wonderful movie!

I waited so long to watch this as it was not available for the international audience until two weeks ago when they released it on YouTube.

From the beginning to till the end you are going to feel a lot of things that you have never felt before. Because if I be honest I would say we, who can both hear and talk can never truly feel what a deaf/mute/ mute & deaf person really feels. We can try to understand but its far from being felt like one. The mature people can decode the silence but when that silence becomes your life then it's hard to understand spoken words. Which is why this film excels in portraying the message clear and loud. They made you feel those complicated emotions with silence and stares.

Now the most important thing that holds everything together is the leads acting and their insane chemistry. Oh my my I could feel the love from the screen! From hesitant gaze to slow stare I fell in love with the characters. Their chemistry was chemistring >.<

The OSTs and the music just hits the spot! I can definitely listen to them all day. They're so melodious and meaningful. From the trailer it's the first thing that made me want to watch the movie.

This movie is highly recommended if you want to let go of stress and those pent up emotions, then this is for you. It has fluff, a bit comedy, romance and a door to the wall of silence.

After finishing the movie now I can understand why is it named "One More Time. With Feelings"!

Read More

One of the best stories ever written.

I'd like to note that I studied to become a writer. I wrote novel, short story, mainly thriller. I consider myself lazy to write this kind of thing, never wrote a review, but now here I am. I want to encourage writers and authors to watch this movie and learn from it. The Call, for me, one of the best stories ever written. So well made.

In literature especially for thriller, there's a concept called "stake". Basically, it means that the protagonist, who has a goal, encounter the antagonist who disrupts the goal, and the antagonist threaten the protagonist so that the protagonist has no choice but to pursue the goal.
This may sounded complicated, but listen. Most of the stories out there forget this thing. They write the protagonist need to pursue his/her goal because it's the goal, some sort of ambition. Wrong. Writers need to set the stake, for example, if the protagonist fails to reach the goal, they will die, or somebody die.

One thing that I'd like to note about The Call is there are no scene that useless. I hate this kind of useless scene. Most writers often uses scene for a simple "dramatic effect" that actually so silly. They fails to realize that those scene are garbage.
A scene must have one important key, "progression". Something yearns to progress. Either a new information, character development, relationship, etc. Two types of scene: action scene and reaction scene. Not trying to be a nerd with this but I analyzed everything in The Call, and it followed the basic theory of 27 structure.

This is how you write a story. All of the directors! Writers! whatever, watch this thing. Watch this. Learn.

"Oh, that concept of time paradox is very common."
Bro, shut up. I don't care about the theme. I'm not talking about the theme. If it's mainstream, so be it. I don't care. I watched lots of movie with great concept, big potential, but ended up as a waste, a dogshit.

Good or bad writing in movie is a preferences. But, correct or wrong writing in movie is a fact.

Spoiler:
It's just that police's death that felt off to me. That probably the only one plot hole nonsense in the story. Also, I felt it silly when the antagonist manages to avoid getting caught, somehow. I mean, starts from she killed her mom, especially when she killed the strawberry guy, it obvious that the police should know about this. However, they didn't. And it made the police looked dumb, disappointing the viewer and also insulting the viewer.
I think what should be done is the writer should create the antagonist more organized, not impulsive like that. This made the antagonist appeared smart, and the viewer would respect her and more scared to her. I mean, seriously? She killed the strawberry guy like it was Tuesday and the police really that one of an imbecile?

Read More

Wholesome father daughter story

There’s not much to say for this movie, its nothing special or ‘never done before’, it actually reminded me a lot of the K-Drama ‘moved’ with the whole flying around and lifting stuff up in the air thing.

The story following a girl who loses everything, her mom, her job, everything, to a famous construction company since they wanted to bulldoze her chicken shop.
Her father heard of the news and decided to help her despite their relationship being rocky.

I wish they had told us the reason he left them. Surely it must’ve been bigger than just him leaving because he couldn’t afford staying with them. Imagine leaving your family and getting a divorce over that…?

However it was a nice story between him and his daughter. And though the movie doesn’t really have any other plots going on around it other than the main thing which is winning against the construction company, it was still enjoyable to binge while i’m bored.

Cute little movie to watch! I recommend it.

Read More

Touching

I guess what impressed me the most with this movie was the female lead's acting. I liked how she acted on her scenes and character. She really aced this one. Both performances of the leads were great, but the female lead left a deep impression on me.

Anyway, plotwise, I researched the original story (the real-life one), and I realized they changed it a little. I still like it, though. The storyline is not lacking. It successfully captures what they want to show, from how they met to how they eventually married after what happened.

Also! I am moved by the guy's loyalty, as he stayed and waited until the end. The girl, on the other hand, was understanding, I think? She handled her situation calmly, especially when she was introduced to her supposed-to-be fiancée without remembering who he was. I also loved her effort in trying to remember him.

Overall, it was a great touching movie.

Read More

Worthy Sequel of a Childhood Favorite

There's a certain comfort in revisiting childhood favorites. Ultraman Cosmos 2: The Blue Planet offered exactly that – a chance to reconnect with Musashi and his heroic alter ego, Cosmos. However, as someone who devoured the original series, this sequel wasn't without its flaws.

The movie starts strong, reuniting us with Musashi, now an astronaut, fulfilling his lifelong dream. The nostalgia factor hits hard, especially when a familiar alien threat from space throws him back into the role of Cosmos. The introduction of the underwater alien civilization, the Gyasshis, adds a fresh layer to the world-building, and their connection to the ocean resonates with the film's title – a beautiful reminder of the fragility of our blue planet.

However, the narrative stumbles a bit. The villain, Scorpiss, feels like a generic evil alien out to destroy everything. A more nuanced antagonist could have elevated the stakes. Additionally, the controversy surrounding the alternate version of the film, filmed due to legal issues with an actor, casts a bit of a shadow. While the new scenes with a young Musashi are well-done, it's a reminder of the film's troubled production.

Despite these shortcomings, Ultraman Cosmos 2 shines in its focus on environmental themes. The Gyasshis' plight due to pollution is a clear call to action for viewers to protect our planet. The bond between Musashi and Cosmos is also heartwarming, showcasing the importance of courage and selflessness in the face of adversity.

Ultimately, Ultraman Cosmos 2 is a fun, nostalgic ride for fans of the original series. While the plot may not be groundbreaking, the dazzling visuals, environmental message, and the ever-inspiring Ultraman Cosmos make it a worthwhile watch. Just be prepared for a familiar formula with a side of behind-the-scenes drama.

Read More

Debut of the First Reiwa Ultra

As someone who grew up with the classic Ultraman shows, the concept of an Ultraman movie felt a bit like revisiting an old friend's house – comfortable, familiar, but maybe not as exciting as exploring something entirely new. However, upon diving into this 45th-anniversary celebration flick, I was pleasantly surprised. It delivered a powerful dose of nostalgia, thrilling action, and a hero's journey that resonated on a deeper level than I anticipated. While it delivered a powerful punch of action and a satisfying hero's journey, a few minor quibbles held it back from achieving absolute perfection.

First, the absolute good versus absolute evil narrative, while classic Ultraman fare, felt a touch predictable. While Belial's motivations are hinted at, a deeper exploration of his character could have added complexity to the conflict.

Secondly, the human characters, though charming, felt slightly underdeveloped compared to the larger-than-life Ultra warriors. A bit more backstory or deeper connection to Zero's struggle could have strengthened the emotional impact.

However, these are minor criticisms in the face of the film's strengths. The animation is top-notch, the fight choreography exhilarating, and the soundtrack perfectly complements the action. Most importantly, the film beautifully captures the essence of Ultraman: the unwavering belief in justice and the courage to fight for what's right.

Seeing Ultraseven team up with Zero was a true highlight, a nostalgic nod to the past while celebrating the future of the Ultra legacy. The movie's core message – that heroism is a spark within us all – resonated deeply, reminding me of why I fell in love with these characters as a child.

Ultraman Zero: The Revenge of Belial isn't a flawless masterpiece, but it's a thoroughly enjoyable ride for fans and newcomers alike. It's a celebration of light, courage, and the enduring power of heroes, both on screen and within ourselves. Just prepare to overlook some narrative simplicity and focus on the dazzling spectacle and the timeless message of hope.

Read More

Tori Matsuzaka is mesmerizing

Tori Matsuzaka was the perfect choice for this role! After watching this movie I can't imagine anyone else playing the character. To tell you the truth, he is the only reason to watch this. The perfect, gorgeous, psychotic killer with the mesmerizing eye and devilish grin!

The FL was ok, at least she didn't turn into a damsel in distress. For some reason Mackenyu was in this even though his character was almost non-existent. The rest of the characters were pretty much Japanese crime movie 101.

I would love to see the story fleshed out more. Who is this captivating ML and how did he get his powers? Turn this into a series and watch the cat and mouse games continue!

Another movie to watch after turning your brain off. Don't worry too much about a deep story line and don't expect any life lessons from this. Just enjoy the ride. And the eye candy.

Read More

Profound, thought provoking, Wong Kar-Wai inspired, the movie will worm into your heart.

“Love You To Debt” At first, I thought it was a teenage romcom with forced laughs. Not at all. It’s a drama about Thai society viewed through an improbable love between a debtor & debt collector. The movie is a remake of Korean “Man In Love”. There are many beautiful scenes, some with influences of Hong Kong movies. Wong Kar-Wai provides inspiration for several scenes.
The movie is more profound than anticipated, giving you good food for thought, entertainment, philosophical perspective on life partnership, or even as a cautionary tale on what not to do in life. In the end, it worms its way to my heart. After watching, it’d be best to be neither a debtor or a lender. And if you are in love, hope the two will make each others’ lives better.
(Translated from a review in Thai by movie critic Phitsanulok Review.)

Read More

It wan not a movie, it was a whole journey

which is more painful? the agony of a mother who almost lost her son in an accident and now in coma or the agony of the lover who was in the accident but survived . this story drives into many directions and open up new ways of seeing and accepting the reality. the situation they both face might not the same , the pain, the regret and guilt is the same. the mother and the lover both taking care of one person they treasure the most ,only hoping to see him open his eyes and smile again. this journey is not only about the son but also how the mother accept the lover and support them throughout .

Read More

"Whatever happens, we'll come back for you"

Onoda: 10,000 Nights in the Jungle told the true story of one of the last Japanese holdouts after WWII. Japan surrendered on September 2, 1945. The war ended for Onoda Hiroo 29 years later on March 9, 1974. During his training as an intelligence officer he was told he had to survive at all costs and that "Whatever happens, we'll come back for you.” Onoda learned the hard way that the military was not as loyal to him as he was to the mission.

“We will be back for you. We will be back. Whatever happens---survive!”
Late in WWII, Onoda Hiroo fails pilot school because he has a fear of heights and dying. He’s recruited to train as an intelligence officer and in guerilla warfare in December 1944. Before he leaves, his father (mother IRL) gives him a dagger to kill himself with rather than be captured should the need arise. When he arrives on Lubang Island none of the other officers will help him with his mission which was to disable the airstrip and port. Most of the soldiers are hungry, demoralized, and/or ill. The Americans take the island shortly after his arrival. Soon the only Japanese soldiers not dead or captured are Onoda and the three men he chose to work with him---Kozuka, Shimada, and Akatsu. Believing they must hold their ground until more Japanese forces arrive, they set up camp in the jungle and cause damage to the farmers’ fields in order to keep the locals afraid of them. They subsist on whatever they can find or steal, taking up residence in caves or homemade huts. The small group of holdouts refuse to believe the war is over and patiently wait for reinforcements.

“Try to change the way you see things”
Two different actors played Onoda and his second in command, Kozuka. They all performed admirably as the characters aged and learned to survive in the jungle and rely on each other. The film confined most of the shots to the men and their duties which displayed their arduous methods of staying alive. Bound by their limited outside contact, their lives seemed incredibly sad. They were completely isolated and separated from family and loved ones. As much as the film focused on the holdouts it would have been nice to gain the locals’ perspective of the killers in the hills and the fear they instilled for a time.

“They know that what is complicated and even incomprehensible, sounds true!”
My first thought when Onoda’s father handed him the dagger and told him, “Your body is the Fatherland. Do not let it fall into enemy hands,” was the Spartan mothers’ declaration to their sons, “With your shield or on it.” Ordered not to die and trained to unconditionally obey orders, unwilling to return home defeated, and determined to prove himself, Onoda’s psyche was trapped in a nightmare in the jungle of Lubang. The outside world and even loved ones attempted to convince Onoda that the war was over, but he could only see conspiracy theories everywhere he looked, convinced that Japan was still fighting. Eventually, he had access to newspapers, magazines, and a transistor radio but believed it was all an elaborate ruse to trick them. At some point, Onoda’s rigid obedience and views appeared to come across as an over-inflated sense of self. Why would the enemy go to such extraordinary lengths to trick one man? If he was that important they could have sent in a wave of soldiers to kill him or just bombed the jungle. Onoda had a high level of cognitive dissonance as he clung to his beliefs in the face of harsh opposing facts.

“What if we killed people we’re no longer at war with?”
Onoda and his men were resourceful and resilient. The youngest left after nearly 5 years and another was killed after almost nine. When the second in command was killed after 27 years of holding out, it seemed to chip away at Onoda’s confidence. Despite their incorrect assessments, Onoda and his men were a product of their training and propaganda. They truly believed they were serving the greater good by holding their position on the island. It took as much determination as denial to be separated from family and friends, to live on roots and fruit often with only rudimentary shelter for nearly three decades. In 1974 a Japanese adventurer discovered Onoda and befriended him. The young man caused Onoda an existential crisis as the holdout could no longer deny that Japan and the world had changed. The military bore responsibility as well. The loyal soldiers killed 30 inhabitants over the years. Two of the four died pointlessly and Onoda lost 30 years of his life because no one cleaned up the mess they created. These soldiers were imbedded on islands in the last months of the war when the writing was on the wall. VE Day occurred not long after Onoda was stationed on Lubang and Japan surrendered in August of 1945. All it took was for Onoda’s superior to come back for him. Unfortunately, for Onoda, his men and the people of Lubang, it took nearly 30 years to do so.

30 April 2024

Read More

Marketed as romcom. Directed to be thought-provoking. Tries to be both. Ends up failing to be either

Turns out, if you try to mix a simple love-conquers-all romcom message with a seasoned life-can-be-hard approach, what you get out of the blender is a we-may-do-terrible-things-but-it-works-out-fine kind of outcome.

By the way, just casually walking home in knee-deep water after a downpour... culture shock right there. But moving on.

This movie was sometimes interesting and funny with amusing directing choices, but overall I didn't like the story much, wouldn't watch it again nor recommend it to anyone.

What's the point of this story? A commentary on 'timing' in relationships? It tries to be somewhat realistic and thought-provoking but ultimately fails and winds up shallow and immature.
The two main characters don't really get to grow and change as people and in their relationship with each other. The story basically goes through a lot of twists and turns but doesn't ever get very far.
It borderline romanticizes some toxic choices... and in the end the conclusion seems to be something such as "I just wasn't lucky before but now that might change"... like what?


Okay, real spoilers ahead to go into specifics.


The plot itself seems to be indecisive whether to attribute Guy's and June's apparent bad timing to random bad luck or admit instead that it is, at least in part, consequence of their own making.
Of course some coincidences might be unhelpful in our protagonists' journeys, but isn't that stuff that happens to everyone?

It would make sense for the point of the story to be that they should mature and learn to take matters into their own hands in a responsible manner.
For example, June should stop staying with her boyfriend for her emotional security, get a grip and break up with him in a fair manner so she can try to become her own person first and have a healthy relationship with someone she actually likes later.
And Guy should stop moping and pining aimlessly. For years at that. Instead of drinking excessively, avoiding the matter or presenting it in such a messy way, he should learn to set things straight from the start and have clear conversations.

Guy could just go and say:
"Hey, June. I would like to be honest with you. I like you. We get along so well, and, though I might be mistaken, I thought you'd feel that way too. Now, I don't want to mess up any relationship that you currently have, but I thought I should tell you this. Even if it doesn't sound very good, I can't help but wonder if right now you are with the wrong person for you. This is probably very biased and selfish of me, but still, as you are someone I care about, I thought I'd tell you all this. Please think about it and after some time answer me however you see fit"

There. Then step away and allow June to think things through and give him a clear cut answer.

No messiness. No misunderstandings. No temptation to cheat. No betraying the other's trust for your own benefit of wanting to get together with them.
If June realized that she didn't actually like her boyfriend even if he was a good person, then she should break up with him regardless of getting someone else's confession. Then she could choose to accept Guy's feelings or address them in some other way. Personally I think she should get a life first instead of living through someone else like that.

But instead, the two of them make all the mistakes and we don't really see them evolve as people. We get a glimpse that that might happen... maybe. And that could have been it: learn from mistakes, there are consequences, be better, end. But then the movie ends making it seem the only important thing was that they should get together eventually and that the process wasn't all that important besides being painful and that they were just unlucky and such. After all, there were good things too, so it should all be alright, right?

So, pretty flat. Character growth? Practically invisible. Healthy relationship? Not so far, no. Lesson learned? Not at all, it was all on the bad timing.

Then, they can keep being self-centred, irresponsible and communicate badly. That's fine 'cause stuff works out in the end and the person who gets hurt is just a side character.

The potential was there... Pity.

Read More

An eerie relationship between a detective and his murder suspect

A dark romance between a detective and his murder suspect certainly captivates its audience. Me.

The story is about a detective helplessly falling in love with a murder suspect who was the main suspect of her husband's murder. As the movie takes us through the journey of the detective's romantic and emotional roller coaster, the woman was cleared of the murder simply because she had an alibi.

However, the detective discovered another piece of evidence that proved otherwise.

What did he do?

The story began from the moment he decided to deal with the evidence.

The last scene on the beach is truelly heartbreaking.

Watch this movie.

Read More

what a good surprise

estou levemente impactado com este daqui. não estava esperando metade do que ele foi, fui assitir despretensiosamente e sai surpreso com a qualidade que ele entrega.

eu acho muito interessante acompanhar religião/mitologia ser tratado em filmes pois é sempre 8 ou 80 e aqui é um 80! eu achei de uma certa forma fascinante os elementos que são apresentados aqui, o modo como alguns rituais são feitos, artefatos que são apresentados e toda relação dos personagens com esses elementos. não é o tipo de terror que te assusta mas te faz aproveitar todo o tempo de duração

Read More